On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, David Brownlee wrote:
>>  	What do people think?
>
> Having something that spits out a full config file (w/ no includes) that
> can then be edited would be nice.

 	so that would be option 2 - have a GENERIC.in which creates
 	a GENERIC, both of which are checked in? Or just an option to
 	config which resolves all includes and spits out the result
 	(I'm prefer not the latter :)

-- 
 		David/absolute          -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --