On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:58:06PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <20060209181143.0558a02e.lists@yazzy.org>,
> 	Marcin Jessa <lists@yazzy.org> writes:
> > Why http://www.netbsd.org/guide/en/chap-rf.html#chap-rf-setup-filesystems
> > tells to use FFSv1 instead of FFSv2 ? Is FFSv2 experimental/unstable/slower/xyz than FFSv1 ?
> 
> Because FFSv2 (in NetBSD) doesn't buy you much unless your filesystem is
> larger than 1TB.

Has more that 2^31 fragments.....
And > 2^32 disk blocks seems problematic/buggy
In fact you lose because of the increased size of the inodes and vnodes.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk