christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> | Okay.
> | 
> | Alternatively, it would be pretty easy to apply the diffs to those
> | branches at the same time. I imagine that would serve the same
> | purpose? (The changes are quite straightforward, and I could patch the
> | three branches as well as the head without any trouble.)
>
> If you want to patch head and re-sync the branches (not patch the branches,
> because this does not help much), get permission from the branch owners and
> do it...

I don't quite get the difference -- can you explain? I would have
thought that if I performed the same transformation on both the trunk
and the branch it would eliminate any incremental merge effort the
change imposed. CVS doesn't keep track of change sets, after all...

-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com