Subject: Re: c++ vs. g++ front end
To: None <tech-userlevel@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 03/20/1996 20:08:42
>Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 14:05:06 -0800
>From: Jason Downs <downsj@teeny.org>
>It might help if NetBSD distributed the TeXinfo documentation for GNU
>software, and the utilities to read it. There should have been a /usr/info
>(or, /usr/share/info with /usr/info being a symlink) a long time ago. It has
>/usr/share/doc, after all. If there's no reason to have /usr/share/info,
>there shouldn't be any reason to have /usr/share/doc-- I know I use
>/usr/share/doc a lot less then I use /usr/local/info.
I agree. As a minimum, the texinfo documentation should be imported
for all of the GNU packages we use. I don't think /usr/share/info or
texinfo reading/formatting tools are strictly necessary, but the
documentation itself is. I don't want to have to download all of a
large package like gcc just to extract the texinfo documentation.
--
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com> <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil