Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <199804270441.XAA10545@lotharon.endicor.com>,
> 	Ty Sarna <tsarna@endicor.com> writes:
> > This extraneous dirrm is indeed errouneous, and was not in the package
> > as I submitted it. I don't know where it came from.
> 
> I added it because the package created that directory but didn't remove it
> which caused problems removing your "python" package.

In python package's PLIST-md.{shared|static}, there is explicit
@unexec rm -rf %D/lib/python1.5
so this is not a problem.

-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <dolecek@ics.muni.cz>	http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is better never to have been born.  But who among us has such luck?
One in a million, perhaps.