itojun@iijlab.net writes:
>	I think it is better not defining it in zconf.h, as the symbol
>	will become visible to third-party user code and may affect their
>	compilation (though I believe it is rare to get bad sideeffect,
>	I prefer not defining it for safety).

Well, if zconf.h is included from third party code, don't you have to get
use of off_t right?

-- 
Christoph Badura					www.netbsd.org

	Anything that can be done in O(N) can be done in O(N^2).
	-- Ralf Schuettau (after looking at a particular piece of code)