>>	I think it is better not defining it in zconf.h, as the symbol
>>	will become visible to third-party user code and may affect their
>>	compilation (though I believe it is rare to get bad sideeffect,
>>	I prefer not defining it for safety).
>Well, if zconf.h is included from third party code, don't you have to get
>use of off_t right?

	That is the reason I proposed the patch (see the email I've sent
	an hour before).

itojun