------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <25901.947519382.1@coconut.itojun.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

	To ease /etc/netstart issue, I think it better to move usr.sbin/sysctl
	into sbin/sysctl.  any opinions against/for it?

itojun

------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0
Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="----- =_aaaaaaaaaa1"
Content-ID: <25901.947519382.2@coconut.itojun.org>
Content-Description: forwarded messages


------- =_aaaaaaaaaa1

	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id XAA24412
	for <itojun@itojun.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:11:20 +0900 (JST)
	by sh1.iijlab.net (8.9.1+3.1W/3.7W) with SMTP id XAA22964
	for <itojun@iijlab.net>; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:04:57 +0900 (JST)
  by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2000 14:10:22 -0000
	by itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id XAA01003
	for <tech-net@netbsd.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:10:03 +0900 (JST)
To: tech-net@netbsd.org
Subject: usr.sbin/route6d, or sbin/route6d
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:10:03 +0900
Message-ID: <1001.947513403@lychee.itojun.org>
Sender: tech-net-owner@netbsd.org


	Question: routed is in sbin/routed.  I've put route6d is in
	usr.sbin/route6d.  do you think this is a problem?
	(it was pointed out by  <matusita@ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp>, and now
	I'm wonrdering)

	When I did kame-into-netbsd-current merge, my logic was like this:
	- for non-router, we have stateless autoconfiguration so we do not
	  really use "route6d -q" on non-router.  therefore, we do not need
	  route6d in /sbin.  even if /usr is mounted via nfs, we will have
	  no problem.  (assuming nfs-over-v6 is working)
	  (oops, I still need to move sysctl into /sbin...)
	- for routers, mmm, we'll have /usr in disk anyway
	- putting too many things into /sbin would be bad

	The question really goes down to:
	- do we frequently mount /usr over nfs, via nfs server in separate
	  subnet?  is it true for routers?  if it is true, we may need to 
	  move route6d to /sbin.
	- I think we really need to move sysctl into /sbin.  are you guys
	  happy with it?

itojun

------- =_aaaaaaaaaa1

	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id XAA24439
	for <itojun@itojun.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:13:45 +0900 (JST)
	by sh1.iijlab.net (8.9.1+3.1W/3.7W) with SMTP id XAA22985
	for <itojun@iijlab.net>; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:07:22 +0900 (JST)
  by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2000 14:12:49 -0000
	by itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id XAA01028
	for <tech-net@netbsd.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:12:42 +0900 (JST)
cc: tech-net@netbsd.org
In-reply-to: itojun's message of Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:10:03 JST.
      <1001.947513403@lychee.itojun.org> 
Subject: Re: usr.sbin/route6d, or sbin/route6d 
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:12:42 +0900
Message-ID: <1026.947513562@lychee.itojun.org>
Sender: tech-net-owner@netbsd.org


>	- I think we really need to move sysctl into /sbin.  are you guys
>	  happy with it?

	just a list of facts:
	/sbin/sysctl: openbsd-current freebsd(all) bsdi41
	/usr/sbin/sysctl: netbsd(all) openbsd26

itojun

------- =_aaaaaaaaaa1--

------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0--