In message <tkrd7p5c02h.fsf@parity-error.sm.sony.co.jp>
	on 08 Mar 2000 17:56:06 +0900,
	enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp> wrote:
> > find(1) is used now too, su there will be no memory consumption
> > difference.
> 
> I guess the question is how much of memory comsumed by making find to
> sort, and guess that not so much as temprary storage used by sort,
> since the comparison is done in each directory component.
Yes, that's my point.  Thanks for completing my poor words.

--
Takahiro Kambe <taca@sky.yamashina.kyoto.jp>