Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> The people who suggested /etc/rc.local.d and /etc/rc.pkg.d are trying
> to solve this namespace problem by creating two new namespaces. I
> would prefer to solve it by separating out the namespace within
> /etc/rc.d.
> 
> Declaring '.' or '-' as a separator, and then having
> "/etc/rc.d/foo.pkg" or "/etc/rc.d/bar.local" seems reasonable.

Hmm, this seems to be better than the /etc/rc.{local|pkg}.d :)

One more possible solution (I'm not sure if mentioned before)
is adding /etc/rc.d/{local|pkg} and putting the respective startup
scripts there.

Jaromir
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>      http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
@@@@  Wanna a real operating system ? Go and get NetBSD, damn!  @@@@