Subject: Re: more work in rc.d [was Re: rc, rc.shutdown proposed change]
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@most.weird.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 03/17/2000 00:34:12
[ On Thursday, March 16, 2000 at 09:06:44 (-0800), Greywolf wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: more work in rc.d [was Re: rc, rc.shutdown proposed change]
>
> Why do we care about converts from other systems? What is SO DAMNED BAD
> about having a monolithic rc? Could we not have a stock rc with things
> that could get manipulated by ed, if necessary (backing up rc{,.conf})?
IMO this isn't at all about helping other people accustomed to other
systems -- this is entirely about making a better system that's more
flexible, more reliable, easier to manage, and more maintainable. In
all of those senses it is a step forward (and a big leap forward on some
fronts!).
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <gwoods@acm.org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>