Subject: Re: openssl [was: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc]
To: Johnny C. Lam <lamj@stat.cmu.edu>
From: Frederick Bruckman <fb@enteract.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 03/31/2000 08:32:24
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> I did this on purpose. Our crypto trees don't have the RSA stuff yet
> due to patent problems, but when they go away, and the RSA stuff does
> get imported, this package's logic should just work.
That's not until after November. Why don't we 1) check for openssl, to
see if we need the package, 2) check for rsa.h, and if not present,
stop and warn the user to rebuild openssl with PATENDEDSSLSRC set.
It's bogus to install the openssl package on current systems. After
rsa comes into the tree, it'll still "just work" with two checks, and
after a time we can garbage collect the check for rsa.h.
> > > Log Message:
> > > Check for "/usr/include/openssl/rsa.h" instead of "/usr/bin/openssl" on
> > > -current.
> >
> > smaug% cd /usr/cvs/src-current/crypto-intl/
> > smaug% find . -name rsa.h
> > smaug%
> >
> > It seems our crypto-trees need to get in better sync...
> >
> >
> > - Hubert
>