Sure, if we want to run "something real similiar to posix compliance but
not really there". Like I said, in this vein remove setuid while we're at it.

Holes in that have caused more problems than anything else.

James

>
>> This logic makes no sense though in the larger context. Using this idea
>> then gets() should have simply been removed as well from the library years
>> ago as it's abuse can cause system compromises. 
>
>Yes, it should have.  
>
>						- Bill
>
>
>
>