Subject: Re: errno conflict in kdump
To: None <christos@netbsd.org, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/21/2000 08:01:04
> christos, could you tell me why is the signal.h 1.20 -> 1.21 change?
> it looks to me that:
> - having consistent declaration of "errno" is a good thing.
> - inlined version of sig{add,del}set will not compile due to the
> assignment to function result(!), like:
> (__errno()) = 22;
> - luckily, the inlined version of sig{add,del}set will never be used,
> due to __RENAME().
i was confused about the 2nd bullet. it works fine.
the third bullet confuses me a little.
itojun