Subject: rpcbind vs. portmap
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Chuck Cranor <chuck@research.att.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 06/11/2001 10:46:26
hi-
can someone explain to me why rpcbind has to keep so many
file descriptors open when portmap did not? this is what i'm
talking about:
xxx> uname -sr
NetBSD 1.5
xxx> netstat -f unix | grep rpcbind | wc
39 351 3432
xxx> fstat | grep rpcbind | wc
50 448 3304
xxx>
dwarf9[5]> uname -sr
NetBSD 1.4.1
dwarf9[6]> fstat | grep portmap
root portmap 156 wd / 2 drwxr-xr-x 1024 r
root portmap 156 0 / 11725 crw-rw-rw- null rw
root portmap 156 1 / 11725 crw-rw-rw- null rw
root portmap 156 2 / 11725 crw-rw-rw- null rw
root portmap 156 3* internet dgram udp c0c6d05c *:111
root portmap 156 4* internet stream tcp c0c75000 *:111
dwarf9[7]>
this on lightly loaded systems. what are the scaling properites
of rpcbind?
thanks,
chuck