Subject: Re: sethostent(1): is it really that useful with a DNS?
To: Chuck Cranor <chuck@research.att.com>
From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 06/17/2001 09:56:51
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:46:12PM -0400, Chuck Cranor wrote:
> i contend that DNS transactions are relatively small and most
> LANs between resolver clients and their local DNS servers are
> uncongested.
Wow, an uncongested corporate LAN -- that's quite an interesting
idea :-)
Seriously, though, I understand the desire to be able to use UDP
for things like this.
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>