>"tcpdchk" reports (disingenuously) that "sshd" is not in
>"/etc/inetd.conf", when of course, that's not the issue, as "sshd"
>does use tcp wrappers.
>It appears to be a trivial thing to give "sshd" the same treatment
>as "sendmail". Does anyone object to my committing the following?

	i guess it reasonable, but how many services do we need to list here?

itojun