Subject: Re: upgrade to mv
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 08/15/2001 18:53:03
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 06:42:36PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
>
> This is because on DOS the shell (i.e., command.com) does not interpret
> wildcards. On Unix, depending on what shell you're using, and what files
> matching *.dis already are there, you will get different parameters.
I was just pointing out a particular feature I would like to
see. Just mentioning MS-DOS in this forum should date me as
someone who knows the difference between Unix and DOS
wildcards.
And, quite frankly, I would be perfectly happy fooling the
shell with, say
REN {}.cob {}.dis
if REN needed it and knew how to deal with it.
And, in passing, I would not sacrifice
mv *.c /var/tmp/
to
COPY \var\tmp\*.c
with an implied "." even though the former is more dangerous.
And MS-DOS chokes on the trailing "/" too.
Just odd ideas that just are outlandish enough in the Unix
paradigm to need some lateral thinking. Adding options to
existing commands is seldom the way to go.
++L