> I like the idea of a script to be called better.  But I don't like the na=
me
> rc.foo, as it implies that it might be run at startup.  I'm not sure what=
 a
> .conf file would buy us in this case.

I agree rc.pwd_mkdb is not a very good choice, but please give me
alternative ideas.

The .conf file has a problem: I have no idea about what we could add to
it. This hook script will be completely site specific.

What about pwd_mkdb.local? It's a nice name, you undestand immediatly
that it works like rc.local, but for pwd_mkdb: run after pwd_mkdb and
it's site specific.

--=20
Emmanuel Dreyfus. En tant que serveur, Windows NT fait en moins bien=20
ce que UNIX fait depuis des ann=E9es avec une interface utilisateur=20
que seul un utilisateur d'UNIX est capable d'admirer.
manu@netbsd.org