Subject: Re: stdio FILE extension
To: James Chacon <jchacon@genuity.net>
From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 10/19/2001 13:04:44
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:56:07PM -0400, James Chacon wrote:
> Any even then reading these changes that would affect the apps ability
> to compile, not run. The struct should still map to the same place in the ABI
> with these changes.
>
> Making stuff not compile is a lot less worrisome when it's stuff that's
> already violating specs.
I agree...
So, really, I'd change _ub to be like this:
union {
struct __sbuf _ubu_ub;
void *_ubu_intcookie;
} _ub_u;
to really insure that we break compilation of apps that use _ub.
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>