Subject: Re: don't remove ksh
To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 10/19/2001 19:29:35
Must we use a specialised lister to read these lists instead of just
being able to look at the directory hierarchy?

Suppose I were to tell you that that way lies Linux.   Now suppose I
were to tell you that that way lies madness.  But I repeat myself.

If the hierarchies merge, I might as well use Linux for all the good
it'd do.

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Greg A. Woods wrote:

# Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:29:08 -0400 (EDT)
# From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
# Reply-To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List
#     <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
# To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
# Subject: Re: don't remove ksh
#
# [ On Friday, October 19, 2001 at 08:33:31 (-0700), Greywolf wrote: ]
# > Subject: Re: don't remove ksh
# >
# > I disagree -- I think it should remain separate so that we _can_ tell
# > what's in the base system (/{,usr/}{,s}bin).
#
# Is it really any harder to look at a list of files vs. a directory
# listing?
#
# --
# 							Greg A. Woods
#
# +1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>     <woods@robohack.ca>
# Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>;   Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>
#


				--*greywolf;
--
NetBSD: My Computer Runs!