ahhhhhh, no, sorry, I missed that one!

Carry on...

On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Simon Burge wrote:

# Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:57:23 +1100
# From: Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
# To: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
# Cc: tech-userlevel@netbsd.org
# Subject: Re: Suggestion for changes to df(1) and du(1)
#
# Greywolf wrote:
#
# > why not just set BLOCKSIZE to 1M when running df/du?
#
# Notice how Tomas' output has different suffixes for different sizes:
#
# > # > Filesystem    Size   Used  Avail Capacity  Mounted on
# > # > /dev/wd0a      97M    31M    61M    33%    /
# > # > /dev/wd0e      97M   4.7M    88M     5%    /var
# > # > /dev/wd0g     2.8G   1.5G   1.2G    54%    /usr
# > # > /dev/wd0f      97M   1.0K    92M     0%    /tmp
# > # > /dev/wd0h     1.8G   297M   1.4G    17%    /home
# > # > /dev/fd0a     1.4M   636K   787K    44%    /mnt
#
# We want 2.8G to show up as 2.8G, not 2800M.
#
# Or is this not what you meant?
#
# Simon.
# --
# Simon Burge                            <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
# NetBSD CDs, Support and Service:    http://www.wasabisystems.com/
#


				--*greywolf;
--
NetBSD: Network Power Unleashed.