Subject: Re: syntax ideas solicited
To: Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/25/2001 12:50:34
>> | Any ideas on an appropriate character, or alternate syntaxes, or ideas
>> | on prior art, or just plain ideas?
>>
>> Please don't start adding funny characters at the start of the line,
>> crontab syntax is already foul enough.
>...
>
>Hmmm. Why not hide this new magic inside comments?
>
># %WITHIN=3600
>
>or somesuch.
that also needlessly extends the "foul" syntax. otoh, stuffing an
environment variable is easy enough, and already supported. hmm...i
suppose that job_runqueue() could be changed check that a job was
being actually started within $WITHIN seconds of its scheduled start
time. picky people could set $WITHIN to 5, generous people could set
it to 7200 (or 2h, or whatever) and the default would be 0 (meaning
"who cares"). that seems easy enough.
>> to specify the bounds on when the command should be started of the time
>> specified (with "WITHIN=0" being the default, and meaning "before time for
>> the command to run next" which is what it currently does I believe).
>> (The value would be a limit in seconds, allow "5m" and such if you want).
>
>> Personally, I'd be just as happy if cron would simply ignore time jumps
>> longer than 5 minutes - run nothing at all that was supposed to happen
>
>Personally, I think Hardwired defaults like this usually end up making
>very few people happy.
yep.
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."