Subject: Re: dump dm(8)?
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
From: Marina Brown <marina@surferz.net>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/27/2002 02:00:27
Hi All:
I agree that dm should stay as it is a usefull tool for other
types of job control.
Marina Brown
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2002, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > In this day and age, dm is rather silly. I say that we build our
> > default releases without it, leaving the program around for those tha=
t
> > may want the functionality. Any votes on this? Anyone really
> > desperately need to keep their hundreds of undergrads only playing
> > advent at night?
>=20
> I'd keep it - it can be used for other things than games.
>=20
>=20
> - Hubert
>=20
> --=20
> Want to get a clue on IPv6 but don't know where to start? Try this:
> * Basics -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/05/24/ipv6_tutorial=
=2Ehtml
> * Setup -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/06/01/ipv6_tutorial=
=2Ehtml=20
> Of course with your #1 IPv6 ready operating system -> http://www.NetBSD=
=2Eorg/
--=20
/~\ The ASCII Marina Brown=20
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML marina@surferz.net
/ \ Email! Wide awake in the LAnd of Rip Van Winkle