"Jason R. Fink" <jrf@adresearch.com> writes:
> > But isn't it convenient? 
> 
> I am sure it is, so, I guess my question is,
> if we add an option to a utility that is conformant,
> does that break conformance?

Not at all. You are allowed to have functionality that is an extension
of the standard.

-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com