On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:01:41PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 21:40:33 +0100
> Thomas Klausner <wiz@danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> > Another goal is to have a shell that's in the base system.
> > After all, why do we have three shells in the base system
> > if everyone is using a packaged one instead?

*I* am using ksh and sh ... and on very very bad, stormy and
windy days, I'm even using csh...

> 
> A more specific question is... which is the reason of having two
> bourne shells, ksh and sh?

One for daily use in scripts, one for daily use in your terminals ?
I like it :)

(btw, /bin/sh is about half the size of /bin/ksh ...)

-Martin