Subject: Re: ksh bugs and behaviour questions
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/11/2002 22:32:00
Christos Zoulas wrote:
>>they look pretty much the same size to me (on 1.5.1/vax, at least).
> 162436 2800 6796 172032 2a000 /bin/ksh
> 90855 936 3612 95403 174ab /bin/sh
>
> But I guess sh is cheating because it is using libedit.
well.. the sizes quoted above were statically linked versions, whereas
yours are obviously dynamically linked (is there no statically linked
shell on -CURRENT, like e.g. /sbin/sh?)
--
Matthias Buelow