Subject: Re: ksh bugs and behaviour questions
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/11/2002 22:32:00
Christos Zoulas wrote:

>>they look pretty much the same size to me (on 1.5.1/vax, at least).

> 162436  2800    6796    172032  2a000   /bin/ksh
> 90855   936     3612    95403   174ab   /bin/sh
> 
> But I guess sh is cheating because it is using libedit.

well.. the sizes quoted above were statically linked versions, whereas 
yours are obviously dynamically linked (is there no statically linked 
shell on -CURRENT, like e.g. /sbin/sh?)

-- 
Matthias Buelow