On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 04:26  pm, Andrew Brown wrote:
>> Not related to this mail, but more to your mail about /usr/conrtib,
>> I'm still wondering why postfix is in gnu/dist/postfix since
>> "IBM PUBLIC LICENSE VERSION 1.0 - SECURE MAILER"
>> isn't exactly GNU...
>
> because it's distinctly not a bsd licence?  the gnu source tree isn't
> really just gnu, it's more a non-bsd tree -- the name is just stuck.

Time to update src/gnu/README, then. It's probably more trouble than
it's worth to rename src/gnu/ to something more appropriate, but at
least the README shouldn't lie about what the directory really is.

//joelw