--KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:26:31PM -0500, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> > >
> > >Dunno, what did 's' stand for?  How about 't' for Thread? or 'W'
> > >for lWp? 'f' for Full (for SYSV freaks)
> >=20
> > t for thread sounds better to me than the current s. Choosing t,
> > will free s for sort.
>=20
> t is taken, for tty ("ps -t00").

what about:

P for lwp
s for sort


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>                   --
--                  <salo@silcnet.org>                   --

--KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+ZjrpiwjDDlS8cmMRArncAJ4+7Gxw4oYo3pnbHMWKdJJiQuCLMACghFZi
l28wlDFy/WIjyz4McGpKAk0=
=Px8I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP--