On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:13:51 -0600 (CST)
Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net> wrote:

> You're proposing that we move our "lpd" out of the way in support of
> CUPS "lpd". If CUPS were expected to replace out "lpd" in the way
> "postfix" was expected to replace "sendmail", then it would make sense
> to support it, but it's not, so it doesn't.

Cups was just an example.  There are more printer daemons out there,
see lprng.

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/