On Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at 04:40  PM, Bill Studenmund wrote:

> I think RENAME is really the way we want to go. It's how we've handled
> this in the past, it is the most direct way to fix the problem, and 
> it's
> how we're going to deal with syscall changes in the future. :-)

I'm not sure it really matters that much.  On e.g. sh5, the other half 
of the sign-extended value is going to be ignored, right?  Or is the 
issue "which half"?

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>