On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 02:51  PM, <ragge@ludd.luth.se> wrote:

> As a result of this, I think there may be a reason to remove the
> kvm database alltogether, especially because it would need a bunch
> of extra massage anyway to update it if modules are loaded/unloaded;
> and fall back to the old "nlist" way of retreiving kernel symbols
> if /dev/ksyms is not in the kernel?

I think this is a great idea.  It would allow us to remove a bunch of 
code, as well.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>