header -- mandatory or optional?
To: Havard Eidnes <he@netbsd.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 11/12/2003 07:50:36
On Nov 12, 2003, at 12:50 AM, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for a while now the build of NetBSD on the MIPS ports has been
> broken. The trigger is regress/include/symbolcheck.c, which
> seems to assert that <frame.h> is a mandatory header file.
It seems totally wrong to have a <frame.h>. There is absolutely no
reason to expose trapframes to userland.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>