Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de> wrote on
Sat, 29 Nov 2003 at 00:54:47 +0100 in
<Pine.GSO.4.53.0311290053580.6140@rfhpc8317>:

> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, der Mouse wrote:
> > I may be crazy, but I'm not totally nonsentient.)
> 
> I wanted "no encryption etc." before too, to get scp up to speed (knowing
> the security implications of course)

My [possibly flawed] understanding is that using 'none' causes
authentication to be insecure, not just encryption. So not only might
it compromise the current transaction, it could compromise future
transactions.

--jhawk