On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Greywolf wrote:

> [Okay, this got longer than I intended.  I've tried to inquire/address
> a couple issues herein.  Apologies if I've missed the point.  I tried
> not to...]

Before I bother composing a substantive reply, can I just check whether
you're arguing that the AT&T ksh behaviour is POSIX conformant, or
that NetBSD should ignore POSIX and follow AT&T ksh?  If the latter, I
shall just shrug and ignore you.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@NetBSD.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/acorn26           <URL:http://www.NetBSD.org/Ports/acorn26/>