Subject: Re: Humanization of ls(1)
To: David P. Reese Jr. <daver@gomerbud.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/29/2003 05:42:38
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
> > > SUSv3 says that '-s' is non portable and may be removed from the standard
> > > in the future. I'm not very excited about reading file sizes in gigablocks.
> >
> > "-s" is already in NetBSD. The question is how "-h" interacts with it.
>
> I am talking about '-s' and '-h' interaction. SUSv3 says that '-s' is non
> portable due to differences in block sizes. Thus I don't feel too bad if
> '-h' radically effects the behavior of '-s'.
What SUSv3 say about -h?
- Hubert
--
___ _ _ _ _ * Harddisk Image Cloning *
/ __| | || | | | www.feyrer.de/g4u/
| (_ |_ _| |_| |
\___| |_| \___/ v1.12 out now, including partition support!