Subject: Re: Humanization of ls(1)
To: David P. Reese Jr. <daver@gomerbud.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/29/2003 05:42:38
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
> > > SUSv3 says that '-s' is non portable and may be removed from the standard
> > > in the future.  I'm not very excited about reading file sizes in gigablocks.
> >
> > "-s" is already in NetBSD. The question is how "-h" interacts with it.
>
> I am talking about '-s' and '-h' interaction.  SUSv3 says that '-s' is non
> portable due to differences in block sizes.  Thus I don't feel too bad if
> '-h' radically effects the behavior of '-s'.

What SUSv3 say about -h?


  - Hubert

-- 
  ___ _ _  _   _        * Harddisk Image Cloning *
 / __| | || | | |           www.feyrer.de/g4u/
| (_ |_  _| |_| |
 \___| |_| \___/          v1.12 out now, including partition support!