On Tue, 29 Dec 2003, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> I would advocate that nobody should use the r* commands in their
> thoroughly insecure (non-Kerberized) modes, but that NetBSD should
> keep them until we can be sure nobody is using them anymore... which
> is never.

Er, no. Even then, rsh will still be a lot faster than ssh, which is a
reason to keep it (for me).

I've setup a cluster of 45 netbsd machines some time ago, and
communication there was via rsh as ssh was ways too much overhead (1-2s
vs. 6-8s).


 - Hubert

-- 
  ___ _ _  _   _        * Harddisk Image Cloning *
 / __| | || | | |           www.feyrer.de/g4u/
| (_ |_  _| |_| |
 \___| |_| \___/          v1.12 out now, including partition support!