Subject: Re: RelCache vs. Red Hat prelink
To: Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@netbsd.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/02/2004 01:25:28
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
> RelCache used to work fine for all programs I tested until binutils
> were upgraded to 2.14. For Prelink, it was quite complicated and slower
> than RelCache (in theory), I didn't feel the need to port it to NetBSD. :-)
>
> Obviously, there's still much room for improvements. If you're interested,
> I'll provide you with code and patches for -current.

Um, I just wondered about the overall state, I won't be able to maintain
your code. If it's working, pkgsrc may be a good place to make it
accessible though.


 - Hubert

-- 
  ___ _ _  _   _        * Harddisk Image Cloning *
 / __| | || | | |           www.feyrer.de/g4u/
| (_ |_  _| |_| |
 \___| |_| \___/          v1.12 out now, including partition support!