Subject: Re: Policy questions
To: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/02/2004 11:50:59
>> i have most of a bsd-licenced netcat implementation written that
>> addresses this, as well as other "failings" of the original netcat
>> implementation (cleaner code, support for ipv6 and local domain
>> sockets).
>
>The devil is in the details. I'm not sure what the best tool for this
>sort of thing is, but I guess a netcat-style tool is the most generic
>and flexible.
netcat is probably not the "best" too, since one can also use rdist or
rsync or rdump or something, depending on what you're doing, but
netcat is certainly a damn good tool to have around.
>Code review early and often :)
aye. it needs some finishing and polishing, but i'll send it out for
review once i'm happy with it. damn those crazy connection
semantics...
>> i'll put it in /bin when i'm done.
>
>Why not /usr/bin? (I'm not sure I'm convinced it belongs in the base
>as well, but I really don't know how to decide.)
because it's purpose is more simple and basic, as with all the other
stuff in /bin, and it represents a crude command line interface to
sockets that can be used to aid in restoring /usr when /usr is not
available.
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
werdna@squooshy.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."