--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 06:47:37PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> ["Greg A. Woods" <woods@weird.com>, responding to me]
> >> Assuming the network is one for which rsh would be suitable, I can't
> >> see any [ssh protocol issues with using cipher "none"].  I'd like a
> >> reference to anything anyone has to the contrary.
> > If the network is suitable for rsh then just use rsh!
>=20
> Except that rsh doesn't support some useful things ssh does, such as X
> forwarding and port forwarding, that are reasonably likely to be useful
> even if the network in question is (believed to be) secure enough for
> rsh.

If the network is safe enough for rsh, it's probably safe enough to just run
X over tcp without forwarding it through anything.

-Sean

--
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign                   Sean Davis
 X  Against HTML                       aka dive
/ \ Email!

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/917lcMEZWGhfx9kRAjWEAJ9jCJ7d2t2ycnDkldZnunjshcmlqQCgwg3h
KkeqcF3DgHt48ltNu7nUG/Q=
=uYYy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--