Subject: Re: Progress meter for fsck, revisited
To: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/13/2004 13:37:32
--Apple-Mail-12--914111347
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


On Jan 13, 2004, at 1:29 PM, Greywolf wrote:

> Don't those two kind of conflict, since -p == (parallel | preen)?
>
> [i.e.  I have never seen fsck go parallel without the -p option.]
>
> I would say that you might want to have -P work with parallelisation
> such that it only uses one meter.

-p == preen.  It is really orthogonal to parallelization.  So, no, it 
doesn't conflict.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>


--Apple-Mail-12--914111347
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFABGUdOpVKkaBm8XkRApBBAJ4kkg7nF11Sdoq/Fi8hNpiw5uzfAgCgkRuV
bxFXm/74v66WCfBLzMiNpeM=
=sdam
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-12--914111347--