--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:25:24PM -0500, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com> writes:
>=20
> > I don't think it's worth over-complicating a cute feature that you
> > have to choose to turn on.  This is not enabled by default.  If you
> > want cute, you have to give up something.  In my particular
> > application, I need the cute, and the trade-off is completely
> > acceptable.  What's the problem?
>=20
> It's of sufficently limited value that I don't think it's worth having
> in the tree.

Well, I disagree. I think it's a cool thing to have in the tree, and it=20
can benefit a number of users. Also, it is an option, after all.

And, it can serve as a building block/example for a parallel progress=20
meter implementation in the future.

Take care,

Bill

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFABNFRWz+3JHUci9cRAmY4AJ9Sl9TTW5BDnAJ1D2uKe0+JD4kXoQCeKtVP
9TKioL5byzJ20w0BwczzO5c=
=w1Gu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--