--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:25:24PM -0500, Nathan J. Williams wrote:

> You could, but you'd be giving up the performance benefits of the
> parallelism, which are substantial. I think that running multiple
> fsck's in series when they can run in parallel is downright
> pathological and barely worth supporting.
>=20
(thorpej)> If NetBSD doesn't want the changes, fine.  No skin off my back.
>=20
> I don't think it does.

Wait.... our biggest user base nowadays ist most likely a single-spindle
userbase, and in that case I was teached to not use parallelism anyway...=
=20

Regards,
	-is

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQAT8KTCn4om+4LhpAQEKWQf/SmlmZimOMGigNs1qkQDpoxt7VSvU3Ln0
dRS77yZlkjl//26+y+i9aOhYFnhSQDf1CTlKeYuhSJOCK0kVGAAKMoWPB7lbNznk
fV8TPVnJN2gzuoFUdZBiESq/Orc7q+6o02SYtuGvgzjmsb5DdRrtb4eqdsuwguAo
3xmkMl7Vug4Igifi8p/YWh2NaHv++CN+tg8Fq12TMJ0nb1nZ4rUw2AtkwAbd8MO5
inZwH4QbWhScP3I2+zVIQYp8xoeDVpoUXGsLHRsbW0ObTWhBzT+AmP2IA7XtxHX+
4zfNN4wdyuUbYrwEcCUuoG2wAoy/4hlruAQpME+BTzsS3PaPdBgHoQ==
=2nIi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--