[ On Friday, January 16, 2004 at 14:00:04 (-0800), Greywolf wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: secure PTY allocation (was: screen in dist)
>
> Sorry, Greg -- seen too many instances where the "final implementation
> detail" was actually built into the original design, and thus could not
> be "hammered out".  I say we hammer this one out before it has a chance
> to breed.

Silly pathnames that are created only in userland and which cannot
possibly have anything to do with the functional requirements are
clearly not an issue here.

(this doesn't have anything to do with the kernel either  :-)

-- 
						Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098                  VE3TCP            RoboHack <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>          Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>