On Saturday 17 January 2004 02:28, you wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:37:02AM -0800, Greywolf wrote:
> > I think the veto is in part driven by the GPL; absent that "minor" nit,
> > it'd be a shoe-in to replace window.
>
> Actually, I've never looked at the license if it's GPL then it
> shouldn't go in.  Such a shame such good software has to have such a
> poor license.

It _is_ GPL :(

$ man screen
/COPYLEFT

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/