--DCA/C9WSnDtl50zu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:15:53PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
  | On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Luke Mewburn wrote:
  | > I've considered that a reasonable solution to this is to move
  | > /etc/release from the `etc' set to the `base' set.
  | > This would go against our prior art of not having /etc/ files
  | > in base, but in this case I think that this would be a useful change
  | > and I can't think of any problems with this.
  | >
  | > Any comments/objections?
  |=20
  | Sounds good - etc/release is basically a "checksum" of the userland
  | binaries.
  |=20
  | It would still be nice to have that file updated by "build.sh install=
=3D...)
  | though.

If it is part of the base set, it would be installed by "build.sh install=
=3D",
since that operation copies the base set (and comp, games, man, misc, text,
=2E..).  I.e., there would be no need to provide special support to copy
etc/release in the "install=3D" operation.

Cheers,
Luke.

--DCA/C9WSnDtl50zu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBOQp1pBhtmn8zJHIRAnH5AKC4yYDNOH6Cc2D7x01qldV+fVVrDQCfbbTC
ETwwl697VQC0H1d65R3DO1M=
=7JY2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DCA/C9WSnDtl50zu--