-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thus spake Luke Mewburn ("LM> ") sometime Tomorrow...

LM> [ FWIW: technical arguments have more weight than ``We can not do
LM> that because FooOS does it'' or ``That's not Traditional BSD!!!''. ]

Conversely, perhaps more importantly, technical arguments have more
weight than ``well, we should do it because FooOS does it that way...''

If there's that much technical merit to it, it's going to happen.
I'm not crazy about it, but if it's what works, so be it. *shrug*.

I retract my previous smart-assed comments.

				--*greywolf;
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBQ8y8DOGizqAnVRERAqn3AJsHrckVN5WNsB8oXXtW0mMm0/tJsACgjRUm
gZEHL8zAzBq1kJkCC4MdTMk=
=9b4g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----