Subject: Re: inetd.c log change objections
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@NetBSD.org>
From: Steve Rumble <rumble@ephemeral.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/13/2004 16:25:19
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:31:53AM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:18:30AM -0400, Steve Rumble wrote:
> > Guys,
> > Would anybody object to the following change? The present
> > log message seems to me ambiguous if not erroneous. I'm just
> > hesitant to change something that has been around for so long.=20
>=20
> Split the string and have it indented propery.
This follows the status quo. Should I go ahead and repair the
other long strings while I'm at it?
Steve
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBQUYCL8uCaQyb9VOkAQJZHQgAzXDgLiOg6T+qNDdhx/BENaE7xhKt/jpU
X39pD9+P09mMS0cId5LQcoLuogX8yO6Xe6RlwUbN64cOyL4rGkNkj3jg1CY+o+0u
TNff76hfyhAFsFjTcGuI61ugNCdg6vh9D2SW+8LzJARmYuiIeuFkZ5bjcd3Wm3oa
QcTPKxpe3OEHb0z03I4U2pOXxLVrPxFydF8NKu8T3lBZqc0IJeUTfJiJj3gY6zhC
Zt1VwEtshUYJzotYd0eM+Ah/imX01U+C5W8HGnn2hogs5zbXuV8AE3gMLxq5U7jd
/rMEN/LnF3M83Z5NrMFt+gbnSzW3nOcJ/qw+XZijWL33UNnS9chs+A==
=N52X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--