--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:25:19PM -0400, Steve Rumble wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:31:53AM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:18:30AM -0400, Steve Rumble wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > > 	Would anybody object to the following change? The present
> > > log message seems to me ambiguous if not erroneous. I'm just
> > > hesitant to change something that has been around for so long.=20
> >=20
> > Split the string and have it indented propery.
>=20
> This follows the status quo. Should I go ahead and repair the
> other long strings while I'm at it?

Yes & no. Commit your change, then have a second change to deal with the
other long strings. Separating functional changes from code clean up makes=
=20
it much easier for someone in the future to figure out why code was=20
changed.

Take care,

Bill

--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBR0VRWz+3JHUci9cRAmNeAJ9m9XBhIQaauphpBtmV0GfIW4xdRACfaCUN
Jv9BJJPvtpciGVgg9eLirx8=
=Ee7P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87--