On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 08:20:28PM +0000, Brian Ginsbach wrote:
> I was just offering up something that I have done and working.
> The version I have currently passes the seq tests in GNU
> coreutils.  It also seems to act like plan-9 seq.

My (personal) opinion is that it should go in if:

	a) it has a man page,

	b) it conforms to the NetBSD style, and

	c) it would obfuscate jot(1) or seq(1) to
	   consolidate them.

I think it's reasonable for us to have a seq(1).  It's simple
and light-weight.

-allen

-- 
                  Use NetBSD!  http://www.netbsd.org/